<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are tax breaks for married couples a good idea?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2010/01/are-tax-breaks-a-good-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2010/01/are-tax-breaks-a-good-idea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Omphile Morwalle (u14145571)		</title>
		<link>https://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2010/01/are-tax-breaks-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-15713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omphile Morwalle (u14145571)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=460#comment-15713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Giving a tax break to married couples may have its benefits. The proposed idea, however, also brings about substantial problems which the government must take into consideration.

Such legislation would be a breeding ground for tax evasion. Taking a single couple into consideration,  the the cut wouldn&#039;t be so significant, but on a large scale the effects would have a tremendous impact on a country&#039;s wellbeing. In addition, someone would have to pay for the deficit, and it is highly unlikely that the majority of single individuals would be willing to pay for another&#039;s lifestyle. Apart from the economical consequences, the cut would also bring in its fair share of moral issues; people staying in marriages because they would not have the financial means to sustain themselves individually, which has a larger effect on the children - being raised in a miserable home - to the detriment of society at large. 

The tax rebate for married couples is a double - edged sword. What must be considered is whether or not the benefit exceeds the cost, at large.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving a tax break to married couples may have its benefits. The proposed idea, however, also brings about substantial problems which the government must take into consideration.</p>
<p>Such legislation would be a breeding ground for tax evasion. Taking a single couple into consideration,  the the cut wouldn&#8217;t be so significant, but on a large scale the effects would have a tremendous impact on a country&#8217;s wellbeing. In addition, someone would have to pay for the deficit, and it is highly unlikely that the majority of single individuals would be willing to pay for another&#8217;s lifestyle. Apart from the economical consequences, the cut would also bring in its fair share of moral issues; people staying in marriages because they would not have the financial means to sustain themselves individually, which has a larger effect on the children &#8211; being raised in a miserable home &#8211; to the detriment of society at large. </p>
<p>The tax rebate for married couples is a double &#8211; edged sword. What must be considered is whether or not the benefit exceeds the cost, at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Monique van den Berg		</title>
		<link>https://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2010/01/are-tax-breaks-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-15448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monique van den Berg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=460#comment-15448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are only a few financial advantages for married couples, like better pensions and lower risk insurance and that is why less income tax is such a positive thought. Married couples married couples, both get taxed if both are employed. If the wife stays at home, the one income is definitely not enough to support a family of four. Rather that giving married couples a higher tax allowance, the marriage transferrable allowance will allow the couple to transfer a certain percentage of their personal income tax allowance to their partner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only a few financial advantages for married couples, like better pensions and lower risk insurance and that is why less income tax is such a positive thought. Married couples married couples, both get taxed if both are employed. If the wife stays at home, the one income is definitely not enough to support a family of four. Rather that giving married couples a higher tax allowance, the marriage transferrable allowance will allow the couple to transfer a certain percentage of their personal income tax allowance to their partner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kyle		</title>
		<link>https://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2010/01/are-tax-breaks-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-14394</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=460#comment-14394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[no its bs,  the government shouldn&#039;t be dictating morality, theres pros and cons to getting married, the government should let people decide for themselves if they want to marry or not and therefore should not give any special treatment to anybody.  justice should be blind..., taxes should be based on individual merit, taxing married couples harkens back to the days when men earned most of the money and women quit working after marrige,  what sense did it make taxing a couple as seperate entities when the man made most of the money and the woman made spending money for herself.  Now a&#039;days with more women working than men, the govn&#039;t needs to cut the sherade and stop recognizing marrige as anything but a contract between two consenting, seperate individuals.   Taxes should be individualized its the only fair way forward...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no its bs,  the government shouldn&#8217;t be dictating morality, theres pros and cons to getting married, the government should let people decide for themselves if they want to marry or not and therefore should not give any special treatment to anybody.  justice should be blind&#8230;, taxes should be based on individual merit, taxing married couples harkens back to the days when men earned most of the money and women quit working after marrige,  what sense did it make taxing a couple as seperate entities when the man made most of the money and the woman made spending money for herself.  Now a&#8217;days with more women working than men, the govn&#8217;t needs to cut the sherade and stop recognizing marrige as anything but a contract between two consenting, seperate individuals.   Taxes should be individualized its the only fair way forward&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
