<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Economics in Action &#187; Sport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/category/sport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog</link>
	<description>showing why Economics matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Economics of football penalty shots</title>
		<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/07/economics-of-football-penalty-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/07/economics-of-football-penalty-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>econ-network</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A soccer penalty is a good example of a situation where two choices made at the same time determine each other&#8217;s success or failure. Since the ball moves so fast, the goalkeeper has to move as soon as the striker moves. If a striker is likely to shoot to the left, it is in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A soccer penalty is a good example of a situation where two choices made at the same time determine each other&#8217;s success or failure. Since the ball moves so fast, the goalkeeper has to move as soon as the striker moves. If a striker is likely to shoot to the left, it is in the goalie&#8217;s interest to move in that direction. But if the goalie is going to do <em>that</em>, then it is in the striker&#8217;s interest to shoot to the <em>right</em>, and so on.<br />
It can be shown mathematically that the optimum for both players is to choose the left, right or centre<em> unpredictably</em>. Two studies by economists compare the behaviour of real professional football players to this ideal behaviour identified by economic theory, and find a good approximation. In other words the football players are doing good intuitive economics.</p>
<p><strong>Look it up:</strong> I. Palacios-Huerta (2003) &#8220;<a title="PDF of the published paper" href="http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/ipalacios/pdf/professionals.pdf">Professionals Play Minimax</a>&#8221;  <em>Review of Economic Studies</em>, 70, pp.  395-415.</p>
<p>P.-A. Chiappori, S. Levitt, and T. Groseclose (2002) &#8220;<a href="http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/ChiapporiGrosecloseLevitt2002.pdf">Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer</a>&#8221; <em>The American Economic Review</em>, vol. 92 no. 4, pp. 1138-1151.</p>
<p>Found via Tim Harford&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.ft.com/comment/columnists/timharford">Dear Economist</a>&#8221; column in the <em>Financial Times.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/07/economics-of-football-penalty-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economists pinpoint system for winning at spread betting</title>
		<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/03/economists-pinpoint-system-for-winning-at-spread-betting/</link>
		<comments>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/03/economists-pinpoint-system-for-winning-at-spread-betting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ayres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics of Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen to the interview Download audio file (spreadbets.mp3) Economists at Nottingham University Business School and Nottingham Trent University claim to have found a way to beat the bookies and make money out of spread betting. In a paper presented at the Royal Economic Society&#8217;s Annual Conference, Dr David Paton and Dr Leighton Vaughan Williams show [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to the <a href="http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/test/audio/02/spreadbets.mp3">interview</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/test/audio/02/spreadbets.mp3">Download audio file (spreadbets.mp3)</a></p>
<p>Economists at <a href="http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/">Nottingham University Business School</a> and <a href="http://www.ntu.ac.uk/">Nottingham Trent University</a> claim to have found a way to beat the bookies and make money out of spread betting.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://repec.org/res2002/Paton.pdf">paper</a> presented at the <a href="http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp">Royal Economic Society&#8217;s Annual Conference</a>, Dr David Paton and Dr Leighton Vaughan Williams show that punters can take advantage of different odds quoted by spread betting companies.</p>
<p>The two economists investigated returns to spread bets on one of the most popular markets, the number of bookings points in <a href="http://www.premierleague.com/">Premier League</a> football matches. Dr Vaughan Williams explained:</p>
<p>&#8216;Punters using the system pinpointed by our research would have won in more than 60% of matches examined over the last two seasons. The key to the system is identifying those cases where one bookmaker is offering prices out of line with their competitors.&#8217;</p>
<p>The possibility of betting arbitrages &#8211; buying high with one company and selling low with another to make a sure profit &#8211; has long been well known to punters. But such cases are increasingly difficult to find and spread bookmakers are known to restrict the amount of money that can be bet when an arbitrage position is open.</p>
<p>The two economists describe cases where companies offer prices that are different but not necessarily far enough apart for an arbitrage as Quasi-arbitrages or Quarbs. Dr Paton commented:</p>
<p>&#8216;Quarbs are more common than true arbitrages, and spread bookmakers are much less likely to restrict the number of bets on them. Although betting on a Quarb does not guarantee you a profit, we found 140 cases during the last two Premier League seasons. Of these, 86 would have been winning bets and only 50 would have lost. A punter staking a modest £5 per point in each case would have won almost £5,000 over the two years.&#8217;</p>
<p>Despite the good news for punters, Dr Vaughan Williams adds a cautionary note:</p>
<p>&#8216;Our research shows that, by betting sensibly, punters really can turn the odds in their favour. But they should remember that spread betting is notoriously volatile and it is possible to lose a lot of money in a short period of time.&#8217;</p>
<h4>Notes</h4>
<p><a href="http://repec.org/res2002/Paton.pdf"> Quarbs and Efficiency in Spread Betting Markets: Can You Beat the Book?</a> by David Paton and Leighton Vaughan Williams was presented at the Royal Economic Society&#8217;s 2002 Annual Conference at the University of Warwick.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/LIZDP.html">Paton</a> is Senior Lecturer in Industrial Economics, Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham; <a href="http://www.ntu.ac.uk/nbs/spec/betting_research_unit/index.html">Vaughan Williams</a> is Head of Economics Research, Department of Economics and Politics, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street.</p>
<p>For Further Information contact Romesh Vaitilingam on 07768-661095 (email: <a href="mailto:romesh@compuserve.com">romesh@compuserve.com</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Related information</strong></p>
<p>You can find other publications by these authors, related research and citations from <a href="http://ideas.repec.org/p/ecj/ac2002/155.html">IDEAS</a> and you can search for more Internet resources on the topic of <a href="http://www.sosig.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/search.pl?term1=gambling&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&amp;attrib1=ANY&amp;boolean=and&amp;ranking=on&amp;referrals=on&amp;stemming=on&amp;maxserver=8&amp;method=any&amp;view=batched&amp;bsize=10&amp;categories=on&amp;templatetype=all&amp;highlight=on&amp;database=SOSIG+ZPlugin">Gambling</a> on SOSIG.</p>
<p><a href="http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/issues/">Economics in Action</a> is a collaboration between the <a href="http://www.res.org.uk/">Royal Economic Society</a>, the <a href="http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/">Economics Network</a> of the Higher Education Academy and <a href="http://www.sosig.ac.uk/economics/">SOSIG</a>, the Social Science Information Gateway. It forms part of the <a href="http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk//">Why Study Economics</a> initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2006/03/economists-pinpoint-system-for-winning-at-spread-betting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/test/audio/02/spreadbets.mp3" length="2436310" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

