A degree in economics will have given you the ability to explain complex data in easily understandable terms to different audiences.

“Public and private sectors alike recruit economics graduates, so the opportunities are wide-ranging.”

Postgraduate study can also offer an advantage to those wanting careers in competitive areas such as investment banking.

After all, it’s just paper…right?

If there is anyone who should know, it’s Andrew Bailey, because if you look at the bank notes in your pockets and wallets, his signature will be on all of them. Robert Peston, the BBC ‘s business editor, went to the Bank of England to chat to the man who makes the money we use. He examines how we got into the recent financial crisis and what you can do to protect yourself.

You can find it Here

Stephine Flanders writes that

“Like other governments that are borrowing a lot, ours would be vulnerable if international investors decide, overnight, that sovereign debt isn’t a safe bet after all. We recently won the chance to host the Olympics. But there the similarity ends…

That may change. We may, after all, have some serious political uncertainty coming down the track. But market movements today are a good reflection of the distance between London and Athens.

Investors may worry a lot more about Britain’s public finances than they did a few years ago. But they worry half as much about it as they worry about Greece.”

Its worth a read you can find it here.

Why does this matter? Well think back to the banking crisis two years ago and the knock on effect that one shake can have on a nation. Imagine rather than banks whole nations collapsing.  Economist Jonathan Loynes, of Capital Economics, said that Greece could be a “sovereign equivalent” of Lehman Brothers; the bank which started the collapse.

Will we have to bail out a whole country? Several countries? Time will tell.

We’re not out of the woods yet.

Econstories.tv is a place to learn about the economic way of thinking through the eyes of creative director John Papola and creative economist Russ Roberts.

In Fear the Boom and Bust, John Maynard Keynes and F. A. Hayek, two of the great economists of the 20th century, come back to life to attend an economics conference on the economic crisis.

Before the conference begins, and at the insistence of Lord Keynes, they go out for a night on the town and sing about why there’s a “boom and bust” cycle in modern economies (as you do) and good reason to fear it.

Get the full lyrics, story and free download of the song in high quality MP3 and AAC files at www.econstories.tv

Discuss and enjoy guys!

In English, Incentives make you want to do something you otherwise wouldn’t want to do. Today let’s talk about an incentive which is in the media at the moment, the oft criticised, proposed marriage tax break.

The plan is essentially an easy one. Cut the costs for people who want to get married via a tax rebate, and it makes sense. There is a lot of evidence to support the claim that marriage is good for society.

As the Telegraph reports

The statistical evidence is overwhelming: children brought up by two parents do much better, on average, than children brought up by just one. They are less likely to drop out of school or end up in prison, and more likely to pay taxes and remain in employment. This is not to deny that single parents do an excellent job and raise children who grow up to contribute much to society. It is simply to point out that across the population as a whole, two-parent families are more likely to achieve that result – and couples who marry are five times more likely to stay together, and provide that positive environment, than those who cohabit without any public commitment.

We all benefit from well-adjusted children, who are ‘polite, well educated and contribute to society’ this is what economics calls an ‘externality’ a benefit by a party that is not directly involved in the transaction. Parents are paying an extra  cost which we all benefit from.

Well the first is the claim by Ed Balls that the tax is “trying to socially engineer family life through a tax policy… [it] is hugely expensive and unfair.”. An economist would claim however that “Ahhhh! All taxes change peoples behaviour”  and The Working Families Tax Credit increased the benefits available to single mothers who sought employment thus penalising women who stayed home to look after their children or who remained with their husbands.(the latter claim being VERY  VERY contentious)

The second claim is that the credits “could stigmatise children” whose parents are not married. Again many feel that this is false by providing tax incentives for marriage it is difficult to see how it would  “stigmatise” the children of the unmarried, any more than providing incentives for single parenthood would “stigmatise” those whose parents live together.

There is of course one issue with the above arguments, they all involve children,  supporting and subsidising ALL married couples regardless of their parental status, in effect , penalises everyone else. So should the ‘tax break’ be administered to just  married couples with children? I don’t know?  Of course, nothing will replace a loving, stable, family; interested in their child’s upbringing and this is something that no taxbreak can fix.

There has been a lot of talk in the media about debt. Whether it’s Greece’s spiraling debt, Iceland’s refusal to pay its debt, Dubai having its debt bailed out, Football clubs fighting to stay afloat in sea of debt, student loans and student debt, or the spiraling levels of consumer debt, debt is in the news a lot at the moment. The UK is currently at a record level of national debt, and so is the United States.

But what is debt, and what does economics have to say about it? Debt is borrowing something; an asset, and then paying it back over time.  This immediately leads to some issues; how do you know the person you’re lending to can pay you back? Why would you lend your money to someone? And how do you make money out of lending your money to other people?

One way this is dealt with is via the interest rate. This is a percentage that is paid on top of the amount borrowed, for example a 10% rate on a 100-pound loan results in £110 to be paid back (10/100*100=10). This economic revelation results in all 3 criteria being fulfilled, money being made, money being lent to those who can pay it back (via a method known as self-selection) and therefore an incentive to lend.

Economics teaches us a wide variety of ways to calculate the interest rate. This seemingly asinine thing is fascinating the more you study it. You see the interest rate affects all sorts of things. If the rate of interest falls, then the charges on a loan to buy larger items like cars, furniture, electrical equipment and so on is also likely to fall. Therefore total sales of these goods are likely to increase. Holidays are likely to become more likely and more houses will be sold. You will likely see more tourists as the exchange rate falls (and pounds become cheaper) One of the key things you will learn from economics is that changes to things like the interest rate have knock-on effects (also called externalities). This principle applies to a whole variety of things from signage to coffee prices. Your question this week is what implications could there be to Iceland not paying off their debt?

Answers on a postcard please.

The journey involves Seddiqui experiencing jobs ranging from working as an archaeologist in Arkansas to being a model in North Carolina. Seddiqui is exploring all of the different cultures, environments and careers available in the USA.

Seddiqui is keeping us updated on his whereabouts and experiences on his website – Living in the Map. So far Seddiqui has been offered several permanent jobs and a Hollywood production company are developing a movie about his journey. It seems that unsuccessful interviews are a thing of the past for Saddiqui.

Source:  Sky News.

For some reason maths isn’t often seen as the fascinating subject it is. It allows us to build bridges, measure stars, play hopscotch, make cars, cook; the list seems endless. Economics uses maths to frame and test its theories.

The Radio 4 show More or Less which “is devoted to the powerful, sometimes beautiful, often abused but ever ubiquitous world of numbers” asked well-known guests and contributors to say why they love numbers. The short films include Konnie Huq, Vince Cable and Rick Edwards.

Photo by spud on Flickr

The 12 days of Christmas, a popular Christmas song, begins with the line ‘On the first day of Christmas my true love sent to me’. An American investment group PNC Wealth Management compile a Christmas Price Index (CPI) every year. Taking the meaning of the song quite literally they calculate the cost of true love.

Rather shockingly, in 2008, the cost of buying ‘seven swans-a-swimming’ rose by 33.33% and will now set your true love back $5600. This has been put down to their scarcity. However, the cost of nine ladies dancing remained the same from the previous year at $4759.19.

According to PNC, buying all 364 items will cost you true love $86608. But then you have to think of what to do with 12 partridges in pear trees!