<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Promotional Piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2008/03/promotional-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2008/03/promotional-piracy/</link>
	<description>showing why Economics matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dougan</title>
		<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2008/03/promotional-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dougan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=69#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Dear Karen,
An interesting paper – I was a student at Warwick at the time and wish I’d heard about it at the time. 

Copyright isn’t my strongest area, but I’m interested in intellectual property issues in general.  I appreciate that you probably come at this from an economic viewpoint.  I suggest, however, that companies that turn a blind eye for “promotional piracy” when it suits them probably undermine their ability to enforce their IPR when they do want or need to.  That’s certainly the case with trade mark law, where failure to enforce trade marks can lead to them becoming merely generic.  Another factor for the overall economic assessment, I’d say.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Karen,<br />
An interesting paper – I was a student at Warwick at the time and wish I’d heard about it at the time. </p>
<p>Copyright isn’t my strongest area, but I’m interested in intellectual property issues in general.  I appreciate that you probably come at this from an economic viewpoint.  I suggest, however, that companies that turn a blind eye for “promotional piracy” when it suits them probably undermine their ability to enforce their IPR when they do want or need to.  That’s certainly the case with trade mark law, where failure to enforce trade marks can lead to them becoming merely generic.  Another factor for the overall economic assessment, I’d say.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: econ-network</title>
		<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2008/03/promotional-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>econ-network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=69#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>We only have English, sorry. The EconPapers link might be able to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We only have English, sorry. The EconPapers link might be able to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dil okulu</title>
		<link>http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/2008/03/promotional-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-4157</link>
		<dc:creator>dil okulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whystudyeconomics.ac.uk/blog/?p=69#comment-4157</guid>
		<description>is there any information about this in other languages, maybe german or other else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any information about this in other languages, maybe german or other else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

